PRESS RELEASE : International rules for cross-border access to e-evidence: CCBE urges the Commission to postpone negotiations with the U.S. and the Council of Europe

Following the proposed regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for e-evidence in criminal matters (“e-evidence proposal”), the Commission recently presented two negotiating mandates, one for negotiations with the United States and one on the Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe “Budapest” Convention on Cybercrime. Under these proposals, law enforcement authorities would have the right to compel international data transfers from service providers located in another jurisdiction without the need for a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT).

This direct cooperation between law enforcement authorities and service providers would circumvent the current system which is underpinned by stringent judicial oversight procedures, and would also put the confidentiality of lawyer-client communications at risk. The objective of the proposed legislation is to drive efficiency in the way in which cross-border access to e-evidence is sought and processed.

The CCBE acknowledges the deficiencies and procedural fragmentation evident under the current rules. However, the removal of the in-built safeguards which characterise the MLAT process have the potential to significantly undermine procedural safeguards. Instead, the CCBE favours the approach of reviewing and improving current MLA procedures, for example by making them faster through the use of digitisation and by taking measures to better equip national authorities to respond to cross-border requests.

CCBE President José de Freitas underlined that, ‘’Worryingly, the Council, instead of remedying the major defects which were already contained in the original e-evidence proposal, has exacerbated and undermined the already inadequate procedural safeguards which were present in the Commission proposal. To use this instrument already as a basis for the negotiation of international agreements, without waiting until the European Parliament has taken a stance on the file, undermines the democratic process and must therefore be postponed.”

In its position paper, the CCBE outlines three key precautionary recommendations, as well as seven contingency recommendations should the proposal continue along the current trajectory by establishing direct cooperation instruments.

The CCBE welcomes the more sceptical approach taken by the European Parliament. The Rapporteur for the file, Birgit Sippel, has published a series of working documents which critically assess in detail many of the key issues facing the proposal. These working documents will serve as the basis for the preparation of the draft report of the LIBE Committee, which will be produced by the new Parliament following the upcoming elections.

Bron: CCBE.EU

..........................

Opm. EMLS

Het persbericht van de CCBE verscheen heden zulks naar aanleiding van de voorgestelde verordening inzake Europese productie- en bevelschriften voor e-bewijsmateriaal in strafzaken ("e-bewijsvoorstel") heeft de Commissie onlangs twee onderhandelingsmandaten gepresenteerd, een voor onderhandelingen met de Verenigde Staten en een voor het tweede aanvullend protocol bij de Verdrag van de Raad van Europa inzake cybercriminaliteit in Boedapest. Op grond van deze voorstellen zouden wetshandhavingsinstanties het recht hebben internationale gegevensoverdrachten van dienstverleners die zich in een ander rechtsgebied bevinden, verplicht te stellen zonder dat een rechtsbijstandverdrag (MLAT) nodig is.

De CCBE opgericht in 1960, is een internationale non-profitorganisatie die sinds de oprichting ervan vooraan staat bij het bevorderen van de standpunten van Europese advocaten en het verdedigen van de rechtsbeginselen waarop de democratie berust en de rechtsstaat zijn gebaseerd.

============================= 

EMLS

Utrecht / Haaksbergen, 6 maart 2019